Thesis presentation material live feed, crit.

​This is a live feed of the material I am developing for Friday's thesis presentation in an effort to establish crowd sourced critique as live as possible in these few hours I have left. Please comment if you see any mistakes, flaws or opportunities for further development. Consider all images in-process and ready for change. Thanks and enjoy!

​site plan, still need o draw in landscaping and elevated walkway connecting parks, perhaps the existing carousel also. 

got a crit that the building didn't pop enough. lowered the brightness of context, i think it looks to grey. ​

​money shot. rendering over with some photoshopping only if I have time, thus, the abstract image is a strategy to deal with time constraints.

uniting civic space. floor plan to be substitued by rendering of full building. 

​3d print fail, fill with tacky glue? note, raft and supports not yet removed

​3d print model in context, towers are uniform height. I will print towers at varying heights to glue on top of it, but only if i have time. It doesn't look good without the varying heights and the optional connecting pieces between the towers. In context with the drawings and stuff, might be adequate as is. 

​mechanical pod handler (best name I could think of, up for debate though)

noise due to low sample value, gonna redo the render t tonight while I sleep. Difficulty trying to get crowd in there, and color. Trying to show sense of scale with this one, though, I think the blackhawk needs to be slightly larger.

​circulatory system, people and resources. arrows and a key to be added. hard to delineate the three dimensionality of these systems.

Alternative money shot. to be photoshopped with mechanical pod handler units - one climbing with pod, and one in rest position. Grass textures and sky will be added too. ​I just didn't like that the main shot was of the architecture from far away like it was some jewel to be coveted, basically my antithesis.